Advancing While Weakening The Village: Village Colonization Development and Modernization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/ijldi.v3i1.97Keywords:
Development, Modernization, Governmentality, Village, ColonizationAbstract
This article examines the paradox of village development and modernization in Indonesia which, instead of strengthening, weakens village sovereignty. Departing from the statement that villages must be "urbanized" to be advanced, this research views the narrative as a reproduction of the logic of modernization and colonialism that places the city as the standard of progress. Using the framework of governmentality (Foucault) and Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough), this study unravels the process of village colonization in three phases: the formation of discourse/knowledge, the formation of values and norms, and the formation of actions/behaviors. Data was obtained through a literature review of books, journals, and policy documents combined with dialectics on village reality. The findings show that the discourse on village development is colored by the technicalization of the problem, where underdevelopment is seen as a technical problem such as low human resources that can be solved through training or technology, while eliminating the political and structural dimensions of inequality. This discourse is institutionalized into a norm that internalizes the values of efficiency, productivity, and entrepreneurship as a measure of progress. The final stage can be seen in development practices that direct villages to become obedient beneficiaries, thereby strengthening the top-down power relationship. This analysis concludes that village development within the framework of governmentality is a power mechanism that works productively and forms knowledge, normalizes values, and regulates behavior that subtly but systematically maintains village subordination. The study offers a critical reading to open up space for development alternatives rooted in local sovereignty and potential.
References
Antlöv, H. (2003). Village government and rural development in Indonesia: The new democratic framework. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910302013
Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village governance, community life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047
Breman, J. (1988). The shattering of the Indonesian economy. Routledge.
Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. Longman.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eko, S. (2014). Villages build Indonesia. Village Renewal Development Forum (FPPD).
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine: Development, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). The University of Chicago Press.
Hall, C. M. (2005). Tourism: Rethinking the social science of mobility. Pearson Education.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press.
Li, T. M. (2014). What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(4), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12065
Lipton, M. (1977). Why poor people stay poor: Urban bias in world development. Harvard University Press.
McMichael, P. (2012). Development and social change: A global perspective (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Rigg, J. (2006). Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the rural South. World Development, 34(1), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.015
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press.
Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press.
Sachs, W. (Ed.). (1992). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power. Zed Books.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1994). Can the subaltern speak? In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 66–111). Columbia University Press.
Eko, Sutoro. (2014). Villages to build Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Village Renewal Development Forum (FPPD) and ACCES.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
White, B. (2012). Agriculture and the generation problem: Rural youth, employment and the future of farming. IDS Bulletin, 43(6), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00375.x
Ziai, A. (2015). Post-development: Premature burials and haunting ghosts. Development and Change, 46(4), 833–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12177
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rijel Samaloisa, Sri Widayanti, Putera Perdana, Minardi Minardi, Juang Gagah Mardhika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
